Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Dan Pink -- thank you


This is a very belated thanks to Dan Pink who sat in on Wilkes Tuesday group a few weeks ago. I started this post by transcribing a lot of what he had to say, but have decided instead to post the link to the recording and follow it with verbal snapshots of some of his ideas. Dan believes that anything enduring or great in life (eg. a love affair!) began with a conversation and he's hoping, that conversation by conversation, we can build a world that is 'just plain better'. I know Dan's ideas found fertile ground in our audience and I suspect there will be
"Fed Ex days" devoted undiluted autonomy popping up in more than a few classrooms. Thanks Dan for allowing us to pick your brains..

To listen to the archived recording of our conversation with Dan Pink
(session password = credenda-wilkes):
http://elm.elluminate.com/HOSTEDELLUMINATE/play_recording.html?recordingId=1249712753409_1266366421597

For a great summary of the book: see The Blue Skunk.

For some comments to tantalize and delight::
  • Too often business and education start from the wrong assumption: i.e. that were it not for carrots and sticks, people would just sit there -- inert. Interestingly, we do not feel that way about ourselves.
  • With even a 'rudimentary cognitive skill'. a higher reward leads to poorer performance.
On Autonomy:
  • 'Management' is a very good way to get compliance, but a very poor way to get, engagement which can only be reached through self-direction.
  • Teachers have less autonomy than workers in any other white collar profession.
On Mastery:
  • People are engagement-seeking missiles and will find it in other realms of their lives when they can't get it in a traditional job (or classroom?).
  • The biggest motivator by far is making progress.
On Purpose:
  • Humans want to be part of something larger than ourselves.
  • If we really want people to do great work and prepare students for their future we need to move away from the outdated motivational technology and capitalize on people's drive to do things because they're interesting and contribute to the world. The more we do that, the more we will do right by our kids and make schools a congenial, challenging place to learn.
  • Purpose doesn't have to be big or transcendent. If kids can see the context for what they're studying and how it all fits in, there will be less need for coercive tactics or bribery to get them to perform.
On Extrinsic Motivation (carrots & sticks):
  • The best use of money as a motivator is to pay people enough to unleash their third drive (instrinic/its own reward).
On Education:
  • One of Dan's favourite writers is Carol Dweck (Mindset ; Self-Theories -1999 ): She puts foward 2 theories of intelligence: entity (fixed supply; can be measured by tests) vs growth (each encounter you have is a chance to increase your supply; people take more risks and engage in greater challenges). If you believe talent, capability, and intelligence can be grown, that takes you towards mastery. The entity theory precludes mastery for all but a very few.
  • The disengaged, aimless, purposeless kid is probably not that way in every realm of his/her life (music, sports, after school job, church group, volunteer activities). Often outside of class, kids are profoundly and passionately engaged. It's important to look at those kinds of things for hints about how to engage them: sense of collaboration, more freedom, can more clearly see progress, animated by a sense of purpose.
  • Standardized tests are impoverished measures of what it takes to be an educated person. A different kind of motivation can pay off on standardised tests. They're trying this in 'Big Picture schools' where individual curricula start from and are built around kids' interests.
  • What skills do kids need to be successful? Industry and business are looking for "multis" (-cultural, - disciplinary, -lingual) -- people who are "T's" with both depth and breadth. So let's equip students with great left brain abilities and right brain abilities so they're creative/conceptual thinkers. Let's be sure they have amazing work habits, that they care about others, are great collaborators, can span boundaries, can learn how to learn, and that they're persistent and persevering. That's a tall order ....
  • Any time there's a problem in North America we ask schools to solve it, then don't give them enough money and blame them when it's not solved.
  • Education seems to be making a concerted push right now on the second drive (reward/punishment) -- our schools are 'fighting the last war'.
  • Self assessment is an important habit of the heart. Grades have become a goal in themselves when they should be feedback on the road to mastery. Our (wrong) notion of kids as endlessly manipulable and fundamentally passive has led us to the (wrong) carrot/stick form of motivation. More promising will be to see them as little human beings who respond better to the third drive.


Tuesday, March 2, 2010

A second career

I have reached the 'arghhh' week in the 511 Video Production course. I have decided that although I love the editing part of the work, I am not a camera person at heart. I struggle to assess what's in the viewfinder of the camcorder with an educated eye, but I haven't figured out what the various light presets do which makes that difficult.

How is 'beach' different from 'snow'? or 'waterfall' different from 'profile'? (How often do you shoot a waterfall after all?) I have a colleague who says to look these things up in the manual, but there isn't much there to help me distinguish between them well enough to know what setting is best for say -- inside a white-walled living room on a sunny afternoon? That is where I did the shooting for the final project for this course. This week we have to look at all the footage and create a story board that goes shot by shot through the entire final video.

I did start with a shot list and a list of questions, but I've been reluctant to actually look at the footage because there isn't time to reshoot if I didn't light it correctly (there never was -- that would have tried my subject's patience too much) and I don't have the time to comb through it all this week before I get on the plane for Australia.

The conversation that I recorded was with my teaching partner and friend, Debra. We talk a lot about how we want to spend our last years in teaching and our early years out of it. She said she wanted to work at a local plant nursery because it isn't a people job. I used to say I wanted to tune pianos whenever the job got to be too much for me, but now I think I'd like to edit videos. The power that rests in your hands to pull the threads of a story together is amazing. You can literally put words in people's mouths by deftly rearranging what they've actually said to suit your own theme or purpose.

This week's slide show assignment has been fun from that point of view and I didn't have to take any of the pictures -- just find them and thread them together to create a story. Here is is for your comments and suggestions. I hope you enjoy it.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Invitation to a conversation with Dan Pink

Back in November, when I was taking the Cognition course, one of the assigned texts was Daniel Pink's book: A Whole New Mind. As I wrote back then, this is a popular text in Wilkes courses. It's an interesting read. Even if you don't agree with everything Pink says, it will get you thinking about the importance of creating activities and strategies that will engage both sides of your students' brains to enhance learning, remembering, and responding. On Tuesday, Feb. 16 at 6 pm Pacific time (9 pm Eastern), Dan will be joining the Tuesday EDIM student group online to talk about his new book, Drive.

The Tuesday group (as I've come to think of us) was started by an EDIM student who is in his last course -- Vince Hill of Credenda Virtual School in Saskatchewan, Canada. He wanted to provide a way for EDIM students to meet and talk in real time once a week. For me the conversations have been a highlight of the program. As an "old school" person, I find I sometimes miss the interchange between students that takes place face to face in a local coffee shop after class. The discussion threads in the course Moodles are a great way to share ideas about a specific topic or question, and you do meet some of the same people in different courses, but the informal online meet-ups using Vince's Elluminate room give us a chance to share our successes, air our frustrations, ask questions about assignments to clarify expectations, and catch up with how everyone is doing. As was made so clear in the Cognition course (and in Dan's book), the social dimension of learning is an important one.

I know Vince is totally sold on the message in Dan's newest book. Vince is a thinking educator who generally doesn't use a lot of words to frame his ideas, but his latest blog post (Can we motivate students?Or do they have to be self-motivated?), an exploration of how Pink's ideas play out in education, is a long one. (When Vince writes upwards of 10 long paragraphs, you know he's excited about his topic. LOL!)

The issue of motivation has been troubling Vince for some time especially in his work with those of his students who don't attach much value to formal education. The underlying premise in
Drive -- i.e. that extrinsic motivators don't work, have never worked and will never work -- makes huge sense to him. Vince sees extrinsic rewards (promising a screaming child an ice cream for good behaviour; paying students for perfect attendance; dangling a corporate carrot in front of a worker) as a form of negative reinforcement. In its true sense, "negative reinforcement" means increasing "the future probability of behavour" with a reward rather than diminishing it. The child comes to know that if he's bad, he'll get a treat; the student learns to comply when there's money on the line; the worker becomes dependent on bonuses as the reason to strive for superior performance. Vince's own experiences as an educator have been confirmed by the research and conclusions in Drive.

For Pink the true motive underlying the corporate world's use of extrinsic rewards is not to increase performance but to exert a form of control over the workforce. (Otherwise why would they persist in a practice that has such poor results?) He believes that the 21st century will be the era when finally companies' need for a passionate, creative, and dedicated employees will outweigh their desire to control. It will be economic suicide to continue to ignore the importance of self- (or intrinsic) motivation.

Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation cannot co-exist. Jobs that make filling one's pocket the highest priority seldom also fill our souls. After all -- do we teach because it pays us top dollar for our skills and time or because we love our work? On the other hand, when we know our livelihood is on the line, do we comply with policies we feel are not in the best interests of our students and bury our passions so we can meet external expectations?

I hope you'll join us on Tuesday for what promises to be an engaging conversation with Dan Pink. Vince and Karena (our Wilkes academic advisor) will be hosting the event. I (SueH) will be monitoring the chat panel, so if you type in your questions I'll do my best to feed them to Dan. The session will be recorded and archived and I'll post that link here.

Please note: in the event that many more people come than we had originally expected, there may be a redirect from the first Elluminate room (when you arrive) to a second one on a larger server. Please bear with us as we iron out any wrinkles in the technology.

You'll need the latest version of Java installed on your computer. Vince has recommended that we all clear our Java caches (especially important if you attend a lot of Elluminate meetings), and have a USB mike if you think you may want to ask questions directly. Your normal computer mike will cause echoing and may be disabled by the tech crew. If you haven't used Elluminate before, you may want to login (any user name will do) a little early and be sure your mike and headset are configured to work correctly. The room will be open 30 minutes early.

See you on Tuesday:
~ 6:00 pm Pacific (link to conversion clock)
~ meeting link: http://tinyurl.com/ycm8dj6

Thursday, February 4, 2010

I think I've cracked it!!

I knew when I started the 511 course in Portable Video Production that I was in for trouble. My dad loved photography and wanted to teach his children how to use a camera and share his passion. I recall his giving me instruction about f-stops, apertures, and shutter speeds, and I also recall being quite baffled by it all. I'd try to remember what he said, but it seemed that as I got older any piece of equipment that had anything to do with image production became my nemesis. I accepted that photography would never be my thing.

When I was first teaching there were no photocopy machines. We had to write or type a worksheet by hand and then burn a stencil from that using a machine called a Thermofax (not a fax machine but an infrared heat device that is still used in tatoo parlours!)



The Thermofax would make a transfer, or 'spirit master', of the worksheet which was in turn laid onto the drum of the ditto machine. The copies were cranked out like this.



They were a distinctive shade of purple, and if you had to use them right away would still be damp and smelling of the alcohol used in the process.

Anyway, I could never remember the settings on the thermofax -- too hot? the stencil would burn; too cool? the worksheet would be so faint the kids could not read it. Now I can't remember the settings on the photocopy machine and when I try put a book in the wrong place or try to use an alternate tray, the machine reacts in a totally unpredictable way. So I knew that in a course using a moving camera I was going to be up against it, but having decided that I was too old to let past frustrations determine future pathways, in I plunged -- teeth clenched in determination to make this work.

Now I have to say that Frank Guttler, the instructor, is a man with endless patience. He obviously wants us to succeed more than he wants everything to be exactly right. He's the kind of teacher who can live with a few typos or errors in API style if he has students who are showing true improvement. He knows that for some of us (or at least for me) tackling this course is like going to live in an alien world and he's giving me plenty of credit for trying and the marks I need not to give up. He treats us more gently than we treat ourselves.

So yesterday while all my colleagues at school were out having fun in a pro-d workshop, I sat at my desk with my laptop and camcorder. After 2 hours I figured out that if I chose a camcorder setting that would give me footage suitable for the internet or emails and an aspect ratio exactly double that which is required by this course (seemed to make the most sense when I chose it), then the anti-shake function would be disabled. Do people who want to display their videos online or send them to their relatives in Australia have have steadier hands?

The next task was, as Frank had kindly suggested after he tried to view last week's assignment, to "play around with compression." The file was far too large for the course drop box, but the only solution I could find in Adobe Premier Elements 4 was to reduce the frames per second by half and the quality to 30%. This created a dog's breakfast.

Hour after hour ticked by, but finally at the end of the day, I decided to take a look at the mobile settings under the Share tab. I mean -- mobiles have small screens right? And there it was. Under the Mobile menu of Locations & Settings is something called of all things (oh! the irony) "Creative Zen." Creative Zen picks up the settings I have entered from the Export function under the File menu and packages the video into what seems to be a tiny, beautiful .wmv file.



I've sent a test to Frank via email (30+mb now down to a little more that 3), and i have my fingers crossed. It's calling itself a "Windows Media Audio/Visual" file. When I do a search for *.wmv, up pops my test sample. I think I can finally meet the criteria of file size and format without sacrificing quality.

Interestingly when I was coaxing a student through the toughest unit in her math course on Tueseday, I told her it was as if she was on the last 750m of the Grouse Grind (a local attraction). She just had to keep putting one foot in front of the other and not give up on herself.



And that's why I took this course -- to feel the fear and do it anyway. It's my Grouse Grind.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

White Rabbit ... I'm late

I feel like the White Rabbit in Alice in Wonderland.


I have just too many things on the go and this week I go back to work full time until I leave for Australia in 5 weeks. The rest of this post will be in point form so bear with me. The computer is uploading a video assignment to YouTube so I can post it in the Video Production (511) course screening room, downloading the Disney version of the White Rabbit's song so I can add it here, and opening an Elluminate session at Educon2.2. I wonder if my poor machine can handle the cognitive load? (Links to the sessions are supposed to be archived on the conversation page, but when ? A session by session Tweet archive is already together.)

So what am I working on this week?

a) finishing off the first video assignment which was due last week (Wilkes weeks run from Saturday to Friday). I managed to buy the only camcorder in the world that does not compress in a format which my editing program of choice (Adobe Premier Elements) can make use of. It's MPEG-4 files just get garbled in the timeline, and it took me a full day of reading and phoning to finally figure out that I had to buy Quicktime Pro (fortunately not too pricey), save all the clips as .mov files and then they will work beautifully.

b) I'm trying to work out the compression needed to get the file size below 40mb. I'm at 43 and each time I lower the quality or change the frames per second, the video becomes more and more pixely.

c) Listened to a collection of wonderful speakers at Educon2.2. Session 1 was a bust because they didn't have the technology working until later in the morning, but by Session 2 one it was much improved. Students at the host school did all the video, sound, and moderating work for us online participants. Mithun was the best moderator. I'm convinced the Elluminate people should hire him.

By session 6 I had to stop. It's a lot of work to try to listen to a session and chat in the backchannel of an Elluminate room at the same time. My CPU now needs sleep and time to unwind everything. What was very ironic is that I had to "tele-travel" via Elluminate to Educaon on Philly to meet up with a lot of Canadians -- some as close to home as 40km. We're now talking about the possibility of a Caneducon and I will see if I can make my way to ECOO (Ontario) in the fall.

d) taking a free online Drexel worhshop in Algebraic thinking . I haven't dedicated enough time to work on it much yet, but there's always tomorrow night.

e) doing the publicity for the Wilkes/Credenda Elluminate event on Feb. 16 with Dan Pink. He'll be taking about his new book "Drive". It's about motivation -- so is a timely topic after what I viewed at Educon. (Will post the links when this is ready).

f) preparing to host a 1 week math event from here in BC using Moodle which I have not tried before. For details go to -- http://elgg.openschool.bc.ca/pg/groups/1623/math-20/. I have to add my material to the moodle and send out some updates.

Biggest questions answered this weekend: What are Twitter hashtags for? What is backchanneling?
Best workshop I saw at Educon: Field Guide for Change Agents
Most interesting ideas: use a backchannel as students watch a video together in class to gather comments and questions; how to create a collaborative Google slide presentation as part of a workshop (Others to come -- see the intro above).
Most fun: met two Australian women who will be at ACEC 2010 when I'm presenting there in the spring.

Meanwhile here's my shot reel for the Wilkes course. I'm not sure I got the contract dolly shot right, but it was fun getting my husband to help me with my homework. (If you're taking this course, let your family and friends know they'll be pressed into helping out. You'll need performers. My brother is an actor. Maybe I can get his help for the last piece. If I go over and shoot it in the middle of the month, I'll be able to do the editing on the plane on my way south. My last week of 511 will be handled from down under. Must remember to order the books for the next one so I can take them with me. )


What I learned today: if you find my video slow to load, view it on Youtube and click the 4th box from the right below the video and change the setting from 360p to 480p. It will stop all the spooling and the video will play smoothly. Who knew?!!? I have no idea what that stands for but it's nice to know what it does.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Educon 2.2



[Note: there are several videos in this post. If you can't see them in Firefox, try again in Internet Explorer.]


There's a wonderful conference in Pennsylvania next weekend (Jan 29-31) They called Educon 2.2. Attending in person is $175, but attending digitally is FREE. They are going to stream the sessions using Elluminate. There will be a link on each session which will take you right to the live stream from the presentation. If you want to use the mike for questions, a USB set up is best as it minimizes feedback, but you can also use the chat function of the program.

What is Educon?

EduCon 2.2 is both a conversation and a conference.

It is not a technology conference. It is an education conference. It is, hopefully, an innovation conference where we can come together, both in person and virtually, to discuss the future of schools. Every session will be an opportunity to discuss and debate ideas — from the very practical to the big dreams.

The Axioms

Guiding Principles of EduCon 2.2

  1. Our schools must be inquiry-driven, thoughtful and empowering for all members
  2. Our schools must be about co-creating — together with our students -- the 21st Century Citizen
  3. Technology must serve pedagogy, not the other way around
  4. Technology must enable students to research, create, communicate and collaborate
  5. Learning can — and must — be networked
Let me give you a short list of some of the world class speakers who will be leading "conversations" about education and learning there: Gary Stager, Will Richardson, Sylvia Martinez, Alec Couros and Dean Shareski. There are 75 sessions to choose from!



You can register from the website (http://www.educon22.org/attending_educon) and also join into the wiki.

Attending Digitally

  1. Join the EduCon website and post a short bio and photo
  2. Browse the Detailed Schedule and read about the conversation offerings, sketch out which sessions you would like to view. (all posted times are EST)
  3. Follow the streamed elluminate sessions by going to the EduCon session description and click on the Stream Here link.
  4. Follow the twitter hashtag #educon
  5. Post questions, offer links and resources, from the comfort of your own living room, all throughout the weekend.

The videos I have included are educators' pre-conference thoughts and responses to a question posed by Ben Wilkoff: What is your innovation in education? and Why does it matter? I'm getting a sense of what my answer would be but I want to throw out the challenge to others to collect your thoughts and either video, podcast, or Powerpoint your answers. Please share the links in the comment section of this blog and I'll be sure they are featured in upcoming posts.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Technology Integration Matrix

Technology integration is what the Instructional Media program is all about, but until today I hadn't seen such a succinct organizer for understanding how to go about this. This table (click on it for a full sized view) maps uses students make of technology for learning vs ways teachers incorporate technology into their learning activities.














Produced by the Florida Center for Instructional Technology, College of Education, University of South Florida (2009)

I think one important bit of advice here is to resist the urge to feel we are somehow short-changing students if we are not always operating at the far right of the table which corresponds in some ways to the higher orders of thinking and learning in Bloom's taxonony. Personally, I don't see this table as presenting a progression of goals from less to more valid or more ideal, but rather as a patchwork quilt of possibilities. I expect that in the classroom of the future, students will engage in all of these uses of technology at some time and that at any one time an observer will see many different levels of engagement with technology occurring.

If you go to the Technology Integration Matrix website, you'll find an interactive version of the table with links to videos and suggestions for teachers in classrooms with different levels of computer access. Each video shows an example of a classroom application, the NETS standards, and links to any websites or software illustrated in the video. The software selections I looked at were not free, however, so were not really useful to me as we have no budget and can't download!

The link under the table (to the Florida Center for Instructional Technology) is much more promising in terms of providing free and ready-made resources. Under the Starting Points (menu on the left) I checked out what they had posted for Math teachers. There are links to downloadable clipart, presentation backgrounds , themes and templates, podcasts (free from iTunes), and other applications using laptops. Although the laptop suggestions seem to be mostly for Macs, there is lots of PC software that will give similar results and the ideas are good even if you don't have a computer for every child.

If your district, state or province has a similar website with great resources and links, please share it here through a comment. Sometimes I feel like we teachers often go madly off in all directions looking for interesting stuff when a lot of the groundwork has already been done.